Difficulties obtaining accurate
information. Applies to surveys distributed to system administrators inquiring
about the suspected identity of crack attackers, the methods they employed, the
frequency of system intrusions, the systems affected, and the dollar amount
lost as a result of the intrusions. These vital pieces of information, though
often difficult to get from companies because they fear misuse of such
information by competitors, are used as a basis for determining a given organizationÂ’s
system risk management strategies. When system administrators try to project
the right level of investment in computer security that their company should
make, they tend to compare their company’s risk level of “crack attack,” or
intrusion, by assessing the reports of organizations having similar computer
systems and business characteristics.
Because of the problem of ascertainment, precautions should
be taken in interpreting such data. First, one needs to accept that it is
impossible for survey respondents to give completely reliable answers to such
security breach questions. One reason is that an unknown number of crimes go
undetected and therefore cannot be reported. Another reason is that even when
the crack attacks are detected, few of these incidents are actually reported to
authorities. For example, according to the CSI/FBI
2003 Survey, the number of reported incidents is only about 30%. In fact, a
commonly held view in the information security community is that only about
one-tenth of all cyber crimes are detected.
See Also:
CSI/FBI Survey; Intrusion Detection System (IDS).
Schell, B.H. and Martin, C. 2004.
Contemporary World Issues Series: Cybercrime: A Reference Handbook.
Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, 2004.